Welcome to the Penguin's world! Come in and Discover!
Hello friends! I hope you enjoy looking around my blog. I'm planning to keep it updated with pictures, stories, and news of my latest experiences... but since I'm not having too many extreme adventures lately, I'll keep you informed regarding what I'm learning. Very interesting stuff! At least, I think so. I've realized more and more how huge the world is (I know, cliché, but REALLY!), how much cool stuff there is to discover, and what a waste it would be if I just sat back and lived out my life. This blog is an attempt to keep my eyes open, and I hope it will inspire everyone who reads it to do the same. Each week I'll post a list of seven things I discovered about the world that week, and you can check them out on the right in the "Discover Something New" section, or just scroll down to see the most recent one. I hope you find them as fascinating as I do!
As for the Penguins, well, if you don't know what that's about, then I probably don't know you well enough for you to be on my blog! Scat!
For everyone else, Quack Quack, and enjoy. :-)
-Caleb
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Discover Something New #10 Surrender the Dynamite and No One Gets Decapitated!
Sunday: Impossible!
How long do you think a plant seed can maintain the ability to grow into a plant? In northern China a lotus fruit seed was discovered in a dry lake bed (which once was cultivated but has long been dry). The seed was estimated to be 1,300 years old. Amazingly, the seed was able to germinate into a healthy plant (http://www.amjbot.org/cgi/content/abstract/89/2/236). While this is the oldest germinated seed on record, there are numerous accounts of seeds lying dormant for 100s of years until they experience a cataclysmic event (such a fire) that destroys all other plant life. These seeds then sprout, and without them it would take a much longer time for vegetation to return to the devastated area.
Monday: Say What?!
In the great Amazon River there lives a species of fresh-water dolphins. They hunt fish with a sonar system. Their mating ritual is especially interesting: the males swim to the bottom of the river, pick up large rocks in their jaws, and carry them to the top. It seems that the rock must be completely out of the water for it to “count.” The only real theory about this is that the males are showing how strong they are, hoping to attract a female... not that different from humans, actually.
Tuesday: So That's Why:...
Why is American culture so powerful and universal today? We see pictures of a child in a Mickey Mouse t-shirt in rural Uruguay, Eminem fans in Bosnia, and McDonald's in just about every country but N. Korea! May historians emphasize the very early importance of Hollywood. Of course we know the strength of Hollywood today. But the key is that the US jumped on the opportunity afforded by the silver screen sooner than anyone else. During WWI the rest of the western world was decreasing their cultural budget and pouring money into the war. President Wilson, however, saw the war as a chance to increase US influence in the world, and he dramatically increased the funding for film-making, and made sure that film-makers had enough nitrate (a vital element for film and munitions). By 1925, US films made up a huge proportion of films internationally: In Germany, 60% of the films shown in cinemas were make in the US; in Italy, 65%; France, 70%; and in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand, 95% of films were American! The influence of these early films on the local populations cannot be overestimated when we think about the exportation and popularity of the American lifestyle and “American Dream.”
Wednesday: Interesting Place Review:
The city of Potosi in south-central Bolivia is today a city of about 115,000 people, and is at an altitude of 13015 feet (3967 meters), which makes it the highest city in the world. It sits on the silver mines that provided most of Spain's silver (according to official records, 45,000 tons of pure silver were mined from that area between 1556 and 1783, which at current market prices is about 1.5 billion dollars). So it was also one of the richest cities in the world. Founded as a mining town, it soon become the largest city in the Americas with a population of over 200,000. At one point it reportedly had a higher population than Paris or London. But then the silver ran dry, and the economy plummeted. Today tin and a little silver is still mined under hellish conditions, and life expectancy for the miners is about 40 years (however, most of the mines are controlled by the workers, who share all profits. They choose to be miners only because there are no other jobs available).
So, why would you visit Potosi? One reason might be to see the magnificent buildings erected during the town's heyday, but there's a more interesting attraction for the seeker of the bizarre. Apparently Potosi is something like the Las Vegas of Latin America, which seems to attract “get rich quick” hopefuls, alcoholics, and lowlifes who have little left to live for. Both Vegas and Potosi offer the dream of striking it rich without working, but Potosi “takes the cake” when it comes to “laying it all on the line.” Go to any Potosi market and you'll find sticks of dynamite for sale “over the counter.” Anyone with a a few last dollars can buy a detonator, fuse, and stick of dynamite for less than $2 US. There are mine tours for visitors, and part of the tour is to buy the dynamite kit, go down into the mines, and explode the dynamite. Then you can sift through the rubble and see if you've “hit the jackpot.” Happy Blasting!
Not to be too frivolous, there is a tragic side to this as well. Over the centuries of a few drunk crazies who think they're going to make their fortune, and the many peasants trying to survive, it is estimated that 8 million people have died because of the mines (more from diseased from bad air and mercury contact than from cave-ins). The locals say that they are “eaten” by the mine. The dilemma is similar to that over African diamonds; the western consumers create a market for the silver from Potosi (maybe my silver ring was dug up by a 12 year old who spends 10 hours a day hundreds of feet underground), but at the same time, if we stop buying silver, they won't have any income at all.
http://www.travelblog.org/South-America/Bolivia/Potosi/blog-77769.html
http://www.rhymer.net/New%20Folder/AltiplanoI/gallery.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potos%C3%AD
Thursday:
During the Chinese Shang dynasty (1700-11 B.C.), dead kings were often buried with many other bodies, usually with their bodies laid neatly in a row with their heads stored elsewhere. These bodies could be of men, women, or children, of dogs, horses, or other animals that might serve as food, servants, or guards in the afterlife. One such tomb near Anyang contained 160 decapitated victims besides the king himself.
Friday:
Question: Is there anything in your life that you feel you should control more or less?
Question: If you could combine any two animals, which two would you combine and why?
Sunday: On a Personal Note:
“The Battle is in Surrender.” I must admit that I really wondered how to tell this story. But you are the people who have expressed an interest in my life and thoughts, so it would be incredibly shallow to share the thoughts that are relatively abstract and not those experiences that make me feel more vulnerable. This is complicated, and I'm not even sure if I can explain it, so don't feel like you have to read all this. I'll try to explain this as quickly as possible.
Some of you know that over the last year or two I've been struggling with two serious things.
1. The conflict between who I show people I am, and who I really am. I've realized that I'm good at controlling people's perceptions of me, and the problem is that I want to look as perfect as possible. I've worked harder on my image than on my heart, and it has started causing problems. One problem is when people have gotten the feeling that I'm a selfless person (because that's what I project), when I'm not really selfless by nature. But being very conscious about what people think of me, I've lost the ability to be honest about my negative side, so I just get frustrated. The other problem is that I always try to say the right thing or do the right thing that will hit closest to showing my ideal characteristics (quick-witted, calm, wise, capable, etc). If this makes any sense so far, then you can see the problems. I was essentially trying to show only my “ideal self” without changing my true self. For some of you it might be hard to believe that I work through a filter, “But Caleb, you're so open about everything!” Yes, because openness is a positive characteristic that people admire. I don't have much problem writing this so far because I know that most people will admire me being so open about my “mask.” But if it's something I can't put a positive spin on... Yes, maybe now you're starting to see how it works...
2. The second struggle has been with my faith. Most of you know my commitment to my Christian faith and service to Christ, except perhaps those of you who know me only from the last year. That's because I've been inactive in my faith since I returned to America. There are many reasons for this, known and unknown. One is that I am simply not good at balance, in any area of my life. My faith is something like a marriage, there are good years and bad ones. This time, I haven't questioned my belief or God's hand in my life as I have before, I simply felt distant, and unable to close the distance regardless of anything I tried. I felt that I had little choice but to wait for God to speak. I knew from experience that He was waiting for me to be ready to hear what He had to say, which frightened and baffled me. What was He waiting for?!
On Friday I watched the movie “V for Vendetta,” and then I went for a walk, thinking hard about changing the world. I often suffer from delusions of grandeur. I was also thinking about what a person must be like to change the world. I got an urge to stop several people on the street and really ask them what they were truly looking for, what would make them whole. I didn't, but I did take out a pen and make a list of characteristics. “In my heart, I don't care about being: Successful, Popular, Comfortable. I want to be: Peaceful, Joyful, Loving.” I was thinking about what it would mean to really live according to these priorities. As I started walking into an almond orchard I looked up to say hello to the man and small boy playing near one of the trees. Surprisingly, I recognized the guy. His name is Jeff, a student I knew at Butte College, at least five years ago. Turns out he lives a few blocks from my house. Being in the mood to talk with someone I pursued a conversation.
We talked for about half an hour there on the side of the orchard. After a few questions I found out that he's very involved with a new church in Chico, and I asked a lot of questions about the activities, characteristics, and attitude of his church. He enthusiastically told me some of his experiences in the church about people whose lives were completely changing, and about the spirit of excitement and commitment that covered the small congregation. That got my attention. I told him a little of my background and current struggle, and asked him how they sustain and maintain closeness with God. His answer surprised me. “Well... I think it's a lot about surrender.” That wasn't the word I expected, so I took out my pen and wrote “surrender” on my list of characteristics. Jeff went on explaining his meaning of surrender, that it meant giving control of our lives to God, not fighting His plan, letting go of all the details, really trusting Him to be the master planner. This is all stuff I've heard before, but it sounded different somehow.
We talked about other things, and he invited me to his church and evening Bible study. As I walked away I pulled out my list again, and noticed the word “surrender” written there. Suddenly from nowhere I remembered an experience I had 6 months ago, when I was first back in America and very burned out spiritually. I was in church, sitting in front of the parents of one of my friends. At one point the mother leaned forward and said “God gave me a word for you...” To be very honest I'm usually pretty skeptical these 'messages from God', since I know how many voices I have in my own head. But of course I couldn't say I didn't want to hear. I leaned over, and she whispered in my ear “the word is Surrender.” I looked thoughtful and politely said 'thank you,' but I didn't think much about it afterwards. Until now.
Okay, I'm being told to stop fighting. Fighting what?! Surrender what?! Six months ago I didn't know, but I'd been thinking a lot since then. I started to get a picture for how much I control my image, and how important it is to me what others think about me. I started to realize that my goal of being a hero, a model person, a person respected by everyone, while these are good things with good motives, they were my goals, and I was pursuing them my way, and I tried to control events around me that I had no business controlling. Maybe God has a different way than me. Well, I'd already written that I would rather be peaceful and loving than popular and successful, right? I didn't seem to have anywhere else to run. I felt certain that I was being told directly to surrender my control of my image, and be who He made me, not who I want people to think I am. I really can't explain why this effected me so strongly. Just one of those moment, you know, when all the little strings of your life come together and you can see the purpose. A sense of peace I've been craving for so long softly returned, and I was able to cry for the first time in a year. I understood why I hadn't been able to hear God for so long, I wasn't willing to listen to this. I realized how deeply rooted this bad habit is, and how much help I would need to open my heart to true change.
I walked home very slowly, feeling that a wall had finally fallen. I wanted it to stay down. I wanted to do something to make it clear that I was now willing to give control of my image, of events around me, of my future, to God. An idea jumped to my mind: for a long time, one of my ways of controlling my physical image, of feeling like I look different, cool, independent, has been my long hair. Now I'm not saying it was the best look, but I like it. I like how it feels to have long hair, to seems a little different and more rugged than others. Was I willing to sacrifice that small part of my self-image? I fought it, but only a little. It was the perfect symbolic act.
To make an already too long story a little shorter, I took an electric razor and cut off a few pounds of hair. I now have shorter hair than I did 4 years ago when I left for Prague (see picture). It's been an adjustment, but in keeping with my new mandate. It was something of a shock for my parents when they came home. I also tried to defined what lesson I'd learned from the experience, and settled on “The Battle is in Surrender.” Very unworldly logic, without question. My realization is that the hardest battle is in letting go of control of my individual little war, and surrender to the Great General, so I can march under His banner again. After that, it's His fight.
I took a black marker and wrote this motto “The Battle is in Surrender” on my forearm. I think I'll keep it there, so I don't forget. I'm not about to get a tattoo, because I hope to learn this lesson eventually, but for now I want to have a constant reminder.
I feel like I've done a terrible job of explaining what this lesson means to me, how much it could change in me, and why it's so significant. There's just too many details, and each person reading this will take it slightly different anyway. In any case, this was a powerful experience and lesson for me, and I couldn't avoid telling you all the story, why I cut my hair, and why I have a strange sentence written on my arm in pen. Let me know what you think, whatever that may be. In any case, if you've read this far, I really appreciate your interest, and I know I can trust all of you for support as I try to refocus my life and reexamine the way I've lived for the last 15 years. We'll see if I can actually follow through on this one. Meanwhile, I'd encourage you to examine the phrase “The battle is in surrender” for yourself, and see if it makes any sense in your life, or if I'm the only crazy one. :-)
Last Week's Question and Answers:
Q: What makes the difference between a person who sincerely cares about other people, and a person who doesn't?
"The first thing that came to mind when I saw the your question (no deep thoughts!), was sacrifice. A person who cares for another, places value on them. How much value? The Bible uses "myself" as the standard- if I value another more than myself, I am fulfilling (one of) God's commands. Thus, if I sincerely care about others, I place a higher value on their need (safety, comfort, growth, etc.) than my own. If I truly care for another, I am willing to sacrifice for them. God shows the degree of His care for us by sacrificing what is most precious to Him- His son. Your question is essentially the same as one asked Jesus in Luke chapter 10 vs. 29, which the He answers with the parable of the good Samaritan. Like I said- nothing deep, but it made me think think a little of the wonderful love that God has for me!" -Matt, Chicago, Illinois.
Corrections for DSN #9:
"There are two wee slips in phrases that Czechs usually use. It should be "Na zdraví" (slip in spelling) and "Je to pravda!" (your word order is correct, but this is the phrase we use). That activity we are supposed to do in Czech Republic when someone is talking / thinking about you is (as far as I know) hiccoughing." - Marek, Prague, Czech Republic.
"One thing though, about what you were saying about Singapore. Yes, it may be a very clean city but the reason chewing gum is illegal is because of the chewing gum being used to disrupt the doors of the Mass Rapid Transit system, causing costly repair and delays. In such a large metropolitan area where most people get around using public transport, a delay can cost thousands of dollars due to the productive hours lost." -Sara, Chico, California.
Thanks Matt, Marek, and Sara!
Sunday, April 8, 2007
Discover Something New #9 Never Sneeze At An Oily Leaf In Singapore!
Sunday:
Actually...
It's allergy season here in Chico, and I've been sniffing and sneezing worse than I have in many years. This has started several interesting conversations about sneezing (see, there can be a positive side to anything!). Did you ever think that saying “Bless you” is limited to one or a few cultures? Actually, although it seems like a strange custom, most languages have a phrase that others can say to the sneezer (though not all languages have one, for example Japanese does not). In English we say “Bless you!” or “God bless you!” There are two explanations for this. The more interesting explanation is that during the Middle Ages it was believed that when someone sneezed it meant that a demon was trying to get into their soul through their mouth. So “God bless you” was a protection against demons. Also, during the Bubonic Plague a sneeze could be a sign of fatal illness, and so “God bless you” was a blessing for health.
I looked over a list of about 50 different languages, and only a few didn't fit into these two styles: health or spiritual protection, which actually have obvious connections themselves. But there are also some other interesting customs. In Puerto Rico, the first sneeze is responded to with "Salud" (Health), but it is also common for someone to reply to a 2nd sneeze with "Dinero" (Money) and after a 3rd sneeze "Amor" (Love). In Romanian, sneezing is usually followed by replying "Noroc", ("Good luck"). Several languages have responses that wish the sneezer 100 years, for example Polish ("Sto lat" = “hundred years”), Chinese ("bai sui" = "(may you live)one-hundred years"), and Tamil ("Nooru" = “Blessing to live more than 100 years”). Czechs usually use the phrase “Na zdravy” (to your health), but sometimes say “to je pravda” (it is true!). When a Dutch person sneezes three times in succession it is seen as a sign that the weather tomorrow will be good. And speaking of signs, in ancient Greece sneezing was seen to be a sign of approval from the gods. There is even a historical record of the Greek Xenophon going confidently to war because one of his soldiers sneezed while he was promising that they would win. By contrast, in some parts of South India there is a superstition that it is a bad omen if someone sneezes just before someone is leaving on an errand or journey. Consequently, if someone sneezes people often wait for some time before beginning their intended mission.
Many languages also have nursery rhymes about sneezing, for example this Spanish one:
“One sneeze: “Salud” (To your health)
Two sneezes: “Salud y dinero” (To your health and wealth)
Three sneezes: “Salud, dinero y amor” (To your health, wealth and love)
Four sneezes: “Salud, dinero, amor, y alergias” (To your health, wealth, love, and allergies)”
Anyway, all these above make some time of sense to me, but the one I can't quite figure out is the widespread idea that you sneeze when someone is talking/thinking about you. This is a common idea in China, Japan, and India (and if I remember correctly, in Czech Republic, but that might have been about yawning. Any comments from the Czechs?). My Japanese friend Megumi tell me that one sneeze means someone is speaking positively about you, two sneezes means someone is speaking negatively about you, and three sneezes means that you're cold. The Chinese say “yǒu rén xiǎng nǐ ” (有人想你), which translates into "someone is thinking about you". Okay, everyone from cultures that have this idea, I'm curious about the history of this idea. Any thoughts?
Well, that was enough information to make anyone's nose tingle! Now you're prepared to sneeze almost anywhere! So, blowing on to the next item!
Monday:
On A Personal Note:
While riding my bike home last week, I was hit by a leaf. Seriously, I was just riding along, thinking about nothing much and minding my own business, when out of nowhere something large suddenly struck me in the face. I was so surprised (and a little off balance) that I quickly stopped my bike and took a moment to figure out what had happened. My reaction for a second was anger. When I realized that it was a leaf that had fallen from the tree just in time for my face to intercept it, I started laughing. The fact that I'd been ambushed by a leaf was funny! And that got me thinking... why did my feeling change almost instantly from anger to laugher just because it was a leaf? After all, if a person had suddenly come and hit me, I wouldn't be laughing. Okay, there is a difference in pain levels. So let's say that some kids are on the side of the street, and as I'm riding by they throw a big leaf at me and it hits me on the face (okay, use your imagination a little here). The pain level and effect would be exactly the same, but I would be angry, not laughing. And in another example, what if that leaf fell from the tree, but the surprise made me fall off my bike, and I scrapped the skin off my knees and hands? I think I would still be laughing when I realized what happened. Whining like a baby, yes, but still laughing about getting beaten up by a leaf. Hmm, interesting picture.... Anyway, regardless of pain levels, the reactions to being hit by a leaf or a person are very different. So what's the difference?
For me, this experience is about the power of intention. We don't get angry with inanimate objects like we do with animate ones. Inanimate objects can cause problems, but they can't intend to cause problems. This implies a lot of different things. It means that when we want to blame someone (or something), we must find something that intended to hurt us. If a wall falls on a man and cripples him, he won't blame the wall. He'll blame the wall builder, or the person leaning on the other side of the wall, or even the termites in the wall. If that person really needs someone to blame, and can't find any other possibility, then he will blame God before he blames the wall itself. We need to see intention.
The ramifications and revelations of this experience go on and on, and I can see myself starting to write an essay on this, so I'm going to stop here before things get too scattered. Let me know what you all think about this!
Tuesday:
Singapore is recognized as being the cleanest city in the world. Because of the abhorrence of gum spots, chewing gum is illegal unless it is nicotine gum (after all, the only habit messier than chewing gum is smoking cigarettes). Not flushing a public toilet is a crime. In 1994 a 18 year old boy named Michael Fey was living with his mother in Singapore. With some friends one night he went on a spree of spray-painting cars and egging houses. Once caught he was sentenced to four months in jail, a $1,400 fine, and six lashes on his bare buttocks with a rattan cane. The lashing punishment is extremely severe, as the first lashes usually strip the skin from the victim's back. President Clinton even got involved and tried to convince the Singapore Chief of Justice to remove the lashings from the punishment, unsuccessfully. But the number was changed from 6 to 4. After the punishment Michael Fey was treated for emotional distress but not for the pain. He'll have a scarred back for life. Think about that the next time you think of littering!
Wednesday:
World Problems:
Nigeria, on the central west coast of Africa, is one of the world's most populated countries, with 130 million people. It's also one of the richest and poorest countries in the world, depending on where you look. As a country it is rich with oil. Oil represents 80% of the nation's total revenue. In 2005 this came to $60 billion. The problems are twofold:
First of all, the oil infrastructure covered 159 oilfields, uses 4,500 miles of pipeline, and uses 275 flow stations, where massive gas flares burn day and night. The Nigerian government documents 6,817 spills, practically one oil spill every day for the last 25 years. Outside agencies estimate that this number might actually be 10 times as much. The oil fields are in a delta region once rich with fish and fertile agriculture. While it used to be a very easy to get food for the natives, today it is virtually impossible to survive as a farmer or fisherman, and masses of frozen fish are shipped in the delta area.
The second problem is that virtually none of this money helps the common people. In 2003 the Nigerian anti-corruption agency estimated that 70% of government oil revenues was stolen or wasted by government officials. And if a government agency is saying that, you have to wonder if it's not more than 70%! While billions of dollars are flowing into Nigeria, still almost all of the 30 million people who live on top of the oilfields live on around a dollar a day.
Now evaluating the situation according to income is dangerous. Often we see “poverty” and think “oh, they don't have electricity so they must be miserable,” but in fact they can be much happier without our sense of materialism. However, this is not one of those cases. After a number of famous protesting Nigerian writers were hung by the government, the people became so desperate that they decided that violence is their only option. A young Nigerian university lecturer said “we have to carry weapons unless we want to die. Violence begets violence.” The military has been instructed to “meet force with force” to protect the oil companies, and quickly the Nigerian delta has become one of the most dangerous places on earth. In just one example last year, an Italian construction worker was kidnapped from a bar in a village of about 3,000 people. The army responded by burning the entire village to the ground. The Italian was released five days later for a large ransom.
Thursday:
Wow!
The new American Washington dollar coin will have the phrase “In God We Trust” written on the edge of the coin instead of the face, like almost all other US coins. The last coin to have printing on the edge was the 1933 gold “double eagle” $20 coin, which is among the rarest coins in the world. In 2002, a gold double eagle coin sold for $7.59 million – the highest price ever paid for a single coin.
Friday:
Say What?!
In 1928, after the disappointments of the Pact of Paris following WWI, US Secretary of State Frank Kellogg (yes, of the Kellogg cereal family) got an interesting idea from a university professor named James Shotwell. According to Shotwell, the way to stop war was to make it illegal. Kellogg liked the idea, and, with the French foreign minister Aristide Briand, drafted the Kellogg-Briand Pact. They invited all other nations to sign the treaty, and all but five countries in the world signed it in August 1928. Interestingly enough, the treaty is still in effect, which means that war is still illegal.
Saturday:
Questions:
What makes the difference between a person who sincerely cares about other people, and a person who doesn't?
Last Week's question and response: “I'm trying to understand if materialism is so strong in the West because we want thing more than other people, or just because we have more opportunity to get things. Do all people want “stuff”? Have you ever met a person who did not have some desire for material possessions? Please tell me about them!”
Answer from Luke Ogden in Germany: Yes, I've been to a few monasteries of different sorts and have met monks who seriously don't want material possessions. For example I met some hard core ascetics at a small Serbian Orthodox monastery (in the hills in Northern California) who live with only the most basic necessities, which does not include things like electricity or hot water. They spend most of the day every day singing a cappella solo and praying. In any case, they certainly aren't interested in "stuff" or acquiring material possessions. Traditionally, monasticism includes the renunciation of personal property, and nothing at a monastery is the property of one individual.
Actually...
It's allergy season here in Chico, and I've been sniffing and sneezing worse than I have in many years. This has started several interesting conversations about sneezing (see, there can be a positive side to anything!). Did you ever think that saying “Bless you” is limited to one or a few cultures? Actually, although it seems like a strange custom, most languages have a phrase that others can say to the sneezer (though not all languages have one, for example Japanese does not). In English we say “Bless you!” or “God bless you!” There are two explanations for this. The more interesting explanation is that during the Middle Ages it was believed that when someone sneezed it meant that a demon was trying to get into their soul through their mouth. So “God bless you” was a protection against demons. Also, during the Bubonic Plague a sneeze could be a sign of fatal illness, and so “God bless you” was a blessing for health.
I looked over a list of about 50 different languages, and only a few didn't fit into these two styles: health or spiritual protection, which actually have obvious connections themselves. But there are also some other interesting customs. In Puerto Rico, the first sneeze is responded to with "Salud" (Health), but it is also common for someone to reply to a 2nd sneeze with "Dinero" (Money) and after a 3rd sneeze "Amor" (Love). In Romanian, sneezing is usually followed by replying "Noroc", ("Good luck"). Several languages have responses that wish the sneezer 100 years, for example Polish ("Sto lat" = “hundred years”), Chinese ("bai sui" = "(may you live)one-hundred years"), and Tamil ("Nooru" = “Blessing to live more than 100 years”). Czechs usually use the phrase “Na zdravy” (to your health), but sometimes say “to je pravda” (it is true!). When a Dutch person sneezes three times in succession it is seen as a sign that the weather tomorrow will be good. And speaking of signs, in ancient Greece sneezing was seen to be a sign of approval from the gods. There is even a historical record of the Greek Xenophon going confidently to war because one of his soldiers sneezed while he was promising that they would win. By contrast, in some parts of South India there is a superstition that it is a bad omen if someone sneezes just before someone is leaving on an errand or journey. Consequently, if someone sneezes people often wait for some time before beginning their intended mission.
Many languages also have nursery rhymes about sneezing, for example this Spanish one:
“One sneeze: “Salud” (To your health)
Two sneezes: “Salud y dinero” (To your health and wealth)
Three sneezes: “Salud, dinero y amor” (To your health, wealth and love)
Four sneezes: “Salud, dinero, amor, y alergias” (To your health, wealth, love, and allergies)”
Anyway, all these above make some time of sense to me, but the one I can't quite figure out is the widespread idea that you sneeze when someone is talking/thinking about you. This is a common idea in China, Japan, and India (and if I remember correctly, in Czech Republic, but that might have been about yawning. Any comments from the Czechs?). My Japanese friend Megumi tell me that one sneeze means someone is speaking positively about you, two sneezes means someone is speaking negatively about you, and three sneezes means that you're cold. The Chinese say “yǒu rén xiǎng nǐ ” (有人想你), which translates into "someone is thinking about you". Okay, everyone from cultures that have this idea, I'm curious about the history of this idea. Any thoughts?
Well, that was enough information to make anyone's nose tingle! Now you're prepared to sneeze almost anywhere! So, blowing on to the next item!
Monday:
On A Personal Note:
While riding my bike home last week, I was hit by a leaf. Seriously, I was just riding along, thinking about nothing much and minding my own business, when out of nowhere something large suddenly struck me in the face. I was so surprised (and a little off balance) that I quickly stopped my bike and took a moment to figure out what had happened. My reaction for a second was anger. When I realized that it was a leaf that had fallen from the tree just in time for my face to intercept it, I started laughing. The fact that I'd been ambushed by a leaf was funny! And that got me thinking... why did my feeling change almost instantly from anger to laugher just because it was a leaf? After all, if a person had suddenly come and hit me, I wouldn't be laughing. Okay, there is a difference in pain levels. So let's say that some kids are on the side of the street, and as I'm riding by they throw a big leaf at me and it hits me on the face (okay, use your imagination a little here). The pain level and effect would be exactly the same, but I would be angry, not laughing. And in another example, what if that leaf fell from the tree, but the surprise made me fall off my bike, and I scrapped the skin off my knees and hands? I think I would still be laughing when I realized what happened. Whining like a baby, yes, but still laughing about getting beaten up by a leaf. Hmm, interesting picture.... Anyway, regardless of pain levels, the reactions to being hit by a leaf or a person are very different. So what's the difference?
For me, this experience is about the power of intention. We don't get angry with inanimate objects like we do with animate ones. Inanimate objects can cause problems, but they can't intend to cause problems. This implies a lot of different things. It means that when we want to blame someone (or something), we must find something that intended to hurt us. If a wall falls on a man and cripples him, he won't blame the wall. He'll blame the wall builder, or the person leaning on the other side of the wall, or even the termites in the wall. If that person really needs someone to blame, and can't find any other possibility, then he will blame God before he blames the wall itself. We need to see intention.
The ramifications and revelations of this experience go on and on, and I can see myself starting to write an essay on this, so I'm going to stop here before things get too scattered. Let me know what you all think about this!
Tuesday:
Singapore is recognized as being the cleanest city in the world. Because of the abhorrence of gum spots, chewing gum is illegal unless it is nicotine gum (after all, the only habit messier than chewing gum is smoking cigarettes). Not flushing a public toilet is a crime. In 1994 a 18 year old boy named Michael Fey was living with his mother in Singapore. With some friends one night he went on a spree of spray-painting cars and egging houses. Once caught he was sentenced to four months in jail, a $1,400 fine, and six lashes on his bare buttocks with a rattan cane. The lashing punishment is extremely severe, as the first lashes usually strip the skin from the victim's back. President Clinton even got involved and tried to convince the Singapore Chief of Justice to remove the lashings from the punishment, unsuccessfully. But the number was changed from 6 to 4. After the punishment Michael Fey was treated for emotional distress but not for the pain. He'll have a scarred back for life. Think about that the next time you think of littering!
Wednesday:
World Problems:
Nigeria, on the central west coast of Africa, is one of the world's most populated countries, with 130 million people. It's also one of the richest and poorest countries in the world, depending on where you look. As a country it is rich with oil. Oil represents 80% of the nation's total revenue. In 2005 this came to $60 billion. The problems are twofold:
First of all, the oil infrastructure covered 159 oilfields, uses 4,500 miles of pipeline, and uses 275 flow stations, where massive gas flares burn day and night. The Nigerian government documents 6,817 spills, practically one oil spill every day for the last 25 years. Outside agencies estimate that this number might actually be 10 times as much. The oil fields are in a delta region once rich with fish and fertile agriculture. While it used to be a very easy to get food for the natives, today it is virtually impossible to survive as a farmer or fisherman, and masses of frozen fish are shipped in the delta area.
The second problem is that virtually none of this money helps the common people. In 2003 the Nigerian anti-corruption agency estimated that 70% of government oil revenues was stolen or wasted by government officials. And if a government agency is saying that, you have to wonder if it's not more than 70%! While billions of dollars are flowing into Nigeria, still almost all of the 30 million people who live on top of the oilfields live on around a dollar a day.
Now evaluating the situation according to income is dangerous. Often we see “poverty” and think “oh, they don't have electricity so they must be miserable,” but in fact they can be much happier without our sense of materialism. However, this is not one of those cases. After a number of famous protesting Nigerian writers were hung by the government, the people became so desperate that they decided that violence is their only option. A young Nigerian university lecturer said “we have to carry weapons unless we want to die. Violence begets violence.” The military has been instructed to “meet force with force” to protect the oil companies, and quickly the Nigerian delta has become one of the most dangerous places on earth. In just one example last year, an Italian construction worker was kidnapped from a bar in a village of about 3,000 people. The army responded by burning the entire village to the ground. The Italian was released five days later for a large ransom.
Thursday:
Wow!
The new American Washington dollar coin will have the phrase “In God We Trust” written on the edge of the coin instead of the face, like almost all other US coins. The last coin to have printing on the edge was the 1933 gold “double eagle” $20 coin, which is among the rarest coins in the world. In 2002, a gold double eagle coin sold for $7.59 million – the highest price ever paid for a single coin.
Friday:
Say What?!
In 1928, after the disappointments of the Pact of Paris following WWI, US Secretary of State Frank Kellogg (yes, of the Kellogg cereal family) got an interesting idea from a university professor named James Shotwell. According to Shotwell, the way to stop war was to make it illegal. Kellogg liked the idea, and, with the French foreign minister Aristide Briand, drafted the Kellogg-Briand Pact. They invited all other nations to sign the treaty, and all but five countries in the world signed it in August 1928. Interestingly enough, the treaty is still in effect, which means that war is still illegal.
Saturday:
Questions:
What makes the difference between a person who sincerely cares about other people, and a person who doesn't?
Last Week's question and response: “I'm trying to understand if materialism is so strong in the West because we want thing more than other people, or just because we have more opportunity to get things. Do all people want “stuff”? Have you ever met a person who did not have some desire for material possessions? Please tell me about them!”
Answer from Luke Ogden in Germany: Yes, I've been to a few monasteries of different sorts and have met monks who seriously don't want material possessions. For example I met some hard core ascetics at a small Serbian Orthodox monastery (in the hills in Northern California) who live with only the most basic necessities, which does not include things like electricity or hot water. They spend most of the day every day singing a cappella solo and praying. In any case, they certainly aren't interested in "stuff" or acquiring material possessions. Traditionally, monasticism includes the renunciation of personal property, and nothing at a monastery is the property of one individual.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)